Strategi Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif Di Dalam Penelitian Agama
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46445/ejti.v4i1.167Keywords:
Riset, Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, AgamaAbstract
Research does not start from the method but must depart from the root of the problem. Formulating precisely the paradigm and background of the research will help researchers design the research design and determine the method to use. In this case, quantitative, qualitative or a mixture of both can use. Through this paper, it explains that religious research and various topics within it are open with various approaches because of their nature as science. This paper builds research insights ranging from understanding the research itself, determining and formulating research problems to choosing the right approach by introducing various methods. Through this paper, it expected that there would be no difficulty in colliding the paradigm in conducting religious research with a qualitative, quantitative or both approaches.
Â
Penelitian tidak dimulai dari metode tetapi harus berangkat dari akar permasalahan. Merumuskan secara tepat paradigma dan latar belakang penelitian akan membantu peneliti merancang desain penelitian dan menentukan metode yang akan digunakan. Dalam hal ini, dapat digunakan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif atau campuran keduanya. Melalui tulisan ini dipaparkan bahwa penelitian agama dan berbagai topik di dalamnya terbuka dengan berbagai pendekatan karena sifatnya sebagai ilmu pengetahuan. Paper ini membangun wawasan penelitian mulai dari pemahaman tentang penelitian itu sendiri, penentuan dan perumusan masalah penelitian hingga memilih pendekatan yang tepat melalui perkenalan terhadap berbagai metode. Melalui paper ini diharapkan tidak terdapat kesulitan benturan paradigma di dalam menjalankan penelitian agama dengan pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif atau keduanya.
References
Brannen, J. (2005). Mixing methods: The entry of qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research process. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570500154642
Carey, S. S. (2015). Kaidah Kaidah Metode Ilmiah - Penduan untuk Penelitian dan Critical Thinking. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Creswell. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed approaches. Research Design. https://doi.org/10.2307/1523157
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research Design – Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Degeng, I. N. S., & Darmawan, I. P. A. (2017). Peningkatan Profesionalisme Pendidik Melalui Penelitian Dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah. In Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Agama Kristen dan call for papers (Vol. 0). Retrieved from http://semnas.sttsimpson.ac.id/index.php/SNPK/article/view/16
Fink, A. (2010). Survey research methods. In International Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00296-7
Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597–607. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR8-4/golafshani.pdf
Gray, D. E. (2009). Research design: qualitative methods. In Doing research in the real world.
Heit, E., & Rotello, C. M. (2010). Relations between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(3), 805–812. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018784
KBBI. (2017a). Metode.
KBBI. (2017b). Penelitian.
Knopf, J. W. (2006). Doing a Literature Review. PS - Political Science and Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096506060264
Kothari, C. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. Vasa. https://doi.org/http://196.29.172.66:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/2574/1/Research%20Methodology.pdf
Lawson, A. E. (2005). What is the role of induction and deduction in reasoning and scientific inquiry? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 716–740. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20067
Liu, Y., & Kulacki, F. A. (2019). Experimental design. In SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology (pp. 49–63). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02616-5_5
Lumintang, S. I., & Lumintang, D. A. (2016). Theologia Penelitian dan Penelitian Teologis. Jakarta: Geneva Insani Indonesia.
Mackenzie, N., & Knipe, S. (2006). Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues in Educational Research, 16(2). Retrieved from https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/research-dilemmas-paradigms-methods-methodology-2/
Magnan, S. S., & Creswell, J. W. (2006). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. The Modern Language Journal, 81(2), 256. https://doi.org/10.2307/328794
Merriam-Webster Dictionary Online. (2019). Reasearch. Retrieved May 10, 2019, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/research
Mertler, C. A., & Mertler, C. A. (2018). What is action research? In Action Research Communities (pp. 5–30). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315164564-2
Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747
Rennie, D. L. (1998). Grounded Theory Methodology: The Pressing Need for a Coherent Logic of Justification. Theory & Psychology, 8(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354398081006
Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A. J., Ganesan, S., & Moorman, C. (2008). Cross-Sectional versus Longitudinal Survey Research: Concepts, Findings, and Guidelines. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.3.261
Ruane, J. M. (2013). Dasar Dasar Metode Penelitian. Bandung: Nusamedia.
Saebani, B. A. (2015). Filsafat Ilmu dan Metode Penelitian. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Silalahi, U. (2018). Metodologi Analisis Data dan Interpretasi Hasil untuk Penelitian Sosial Kuantitatif. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Slevitch, L. (2011). Qualitative and quantitative methodologies compared: Ontological and epistemological perspectives. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality and Tourism, 12(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2011.541810
Vyhmeister, N. J. (2001). Quality Research Papers. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan.
Walliman, N. (2011). Research and the research Problem. Your Research Project Designing and Planning Your Work. SAGE Study Skills Series, 1(13), 1–56. Retrieved from http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/40600_9781849204620.pdf
Welch, J. K., & Patton, M. Q. (1992). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/330063
Winchester, C. L., & Salji, M. (2016). Writing a literature review. Journal of Clinical Urology, 9(5), 308–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051415816650133
Zaluchu, S. E. (2019). Sistematika dan Analisis Data Riset Kuantitatif (3rd ed.). Semarang: Golden Gate Publishing.
5.jpg)
