Law and Theological Interpretations of Sin and Punishment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46445/jtki.v6i1.1012Keywords:
Sin, Punishment, Theology, Law, JusticeAbstract
This article explores the evolving concepts of sin and punishment through an interdisciplinary analysis rooted in theology and legal theory. It examines how theological traditions understand sin as a spiritual rupture and punishment as a path to restoration, while legal systems treat punishment as a rational mechanism to uphold justice and social order. The study traces the shifting boundaries between divine justice and secular law through historical and thematic analysis, revealing how moral responsibility, repentance, and mercy have been interpreted across various contexts—from ancient religious codes to Enlightenment jurisprudence. The article also analyzes contemporary ethical debates surrounding retributive and restorative punishment models. By integrating theological reflection with legal-historical insights, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of how societies conceptualize wrongdoing and justice and advocates for more holistic approaches to moral and legal accountability.
References
Arnaud, A.-J. (2015). Equity in Law. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86029-8
Bentham, J. (2014). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Literary Licensing, LLC.
Berlejung, A. (2015). Sin and Punishment: The Ethics of Divine justice and retribution in ancient near eastern and old testament Texts. Interpretation (United Kingdom), 69(3), 272 – 287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020964315578205
Berman, H. J. (1985). Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Harvard University Press.
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford University Press.
Bray, S. L., & Miller, P. B. (2023). Christianity and Equity. In The Oxford Handbook of Christianity and Law. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197606759.013.28
Cohen, D. (2005). Theories of punishment. In The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Law (Vol. 9780521818). https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521818400.010
Craig, W. L. (2018). Is penal substitution unjust? International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 83(3), 231 – 244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-017-9654-x
Duff, R. A. (2003). Punishment, Communication, and Community. Oxford University Press.
Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s Empire. Harvard University Press.
Eckert, R. (2011). Punishment, penance and salvation in medieval canon law and theology (12th c. - Beginning of the 13th c.); [Peine judiciaire, pénitence et salut entre droit canonique et théologie (xiie s. - début du xiiie s.)]. Revue de La Histoire Des Religions, 228(4), 483 – 508. https://doi.org/10.4000/rhr.7820
Farrell, E. P. (2021). Penance and Punishment in Early Medieval Ireland. Peritia, 32, 57 – 78. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.PERIT.5.127815
Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Vintage Books.
Ghigheci, C. (2024). Legality and Equity in Judicial Activity. Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, 14(2), 286 – 300. https://doi.org/10.62768/TBJ/2024/14/2/07
Granados, C. (2016). Mercy and covenant in exodus 34:6-7. Scripta Theologica, 48(1), 99 – 111. https://doi.org/10.15581/006.48.1.99-111
Habibzadeh, J. (2005). The legality principle of crimes and punishments in the iranian legal system. Global Jurist Topics, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1535-167X.1147
Hart, H. (2012). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.
Herrera Gabler, J. F. (2014). Bibliographical notes on original sin (1985-2000). Scripta Theologica, 46(1), 141–160.
Himma, K. E. (2010). The problem of unresolved wrongdoing. Faith and Philosophy, 27(4), 405 – 422. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil201027442
Hintzen, G. (2015). The understanding of the punishment for one’s sins in the works of Karl Rahner and Martin Luther. Catholica, 69(2), 143 – 155.
Isabelle, P.-B. (2005). The fair measure of the punishment : In search of justice. Ethnologie Francaise, 35(3), 393 – 400. https://doi.org/10.3917/ethn.053.0393
Johnstone, G., & Ness, D. Van. (2011). Handbook of Restorative Justice. Willan Publishing.
Kant, I. (2012). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (M. Gregor (ed.)). Cambridge University Press.
Kauppinen, A. (2015). Hate and Punishment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(10), 1719 – 1737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514548583
Khodadadi, B. (2024). “Nowhere but Everywhere”: The Principle of Legality and the Complexities of Judicial Discretion in Iran. Iranian Studies. https://doi.org/10.1017/irn.2024.23
Kuczok, M. (2018). The biblical metaphors of SIN: A cognitive-semantic perspective on the english version of the Bible. Linguistica Silesiana, 39, 171 – 186. https://doi.org/10.24425/linsi.2018.124576
Lathrop, G. W. (2017). How forgiveness is spoken among Lutheran Christians. In Signs of Forgiveness, Paths of Conversion, Practice of Penance: A Reform that Challenges All. https://doi.org/10.3726/b11648
Maihold, H. (2020). The Rise of Ethical Reproach in Spanish Late Scolasticism. Ius Gentium, 84, 31 – 44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64163-4_2
Monter, E. W. (2017). Conclusion: Reformations of penance and scholarly renascences of disciplinary institutions. In Judging Faith, Punishing Sin: Inquisitions and Consistories in the Early Modern World. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316492659.027
Nelson, D. R. (2011). Sin: A Guide for the Perplexed. In Sin: A Guide for the Perplexed.
Pihlajamäki, H. (2023). Christianity and Criminal Law. In The Oxford Handbook of Christianity and Law. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197606759.013.29
Ruokanen, M. (2020). Remarks on Tuomo Mannermaa’s Interpretation of Martin Luther’s Lectures on Galatians. International Journal of Sino-Western Studies, 18, 39 – 63.
Sacchi, P. (2004). The pardon of the sins in the judaism from Amos to the I century B.C. Rivista Di Storia e Letteratura Religiosa, 40(1), 1 – 26.
Schelhas, J. (2021). Repentance - Ambiguous Evangelical Lutheran/Roman Catholic orientation sign of faith in God. Catholica, 75(4), 240 – 260.
Shafat, S. (2015). Why Repentance Affects Divine Punishment but Not Human Punishment? Journal of Law, Religion and State, 4(1), 96 – 115. https://doi.org/10.1163/22124810-00401003
Shoemaker, K. (2009). Punishment. In Law and the Humanities: An Introduction. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511657535.021
Smythe, S. (2019). Barth on Justification. In Wiley Blackwell Companion to Karl Barth. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119156574.ch25
Stjerna, K. I. (2015). Grace Only? Or, All is Grace? Dialog, 54(3), 260 – 268. https://doi.org/10.1111/dial.12187
Trueman, C. (2020). Reformed theology in the context of the reformation(s). In The Oxford Handbook of Reformed Theology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198723912.013.4
Van Nuffelen, P. (2023). Coercion in Late Antiquity: A Brief Intellectual History. In Religious Violence in the Ancient World: From Classical Athens to Late Antiquity (pp. 266–285).
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. University of California Press.
Zubillaga, C. (2020). The robbery and its medieval punishment or penance in the context of Ms. Esc. K-III-4. En La Espana Medieval, 43, 51 – 66. https://doi.org/10.5209/elem.68639
Zucca, L. (2020). The constitution of criminal law. University of Toronto Law Journal, 70, 27 – 43. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.2019-0061
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Edi Purwanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal also agree to the following terms:
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
